Why do so many PR campaigns fail with the media? It’s very likely the strategy is off and a generic PR approach from a previous campaign was applied.

By Mark Macias
Founder of MACIAS PR | Former NBC Executive Producer
One of the biggest misconceptions people have about PR is the belief that media campaigns operate like a generic transaction.
Build a large enough media list, send enough emails, follow the right “formula,” and eventually coverage will hit. It doesn’t work like that. And unfortunately, it’s not just founders and CMOs that believe PR is as simple as that.
A few weeks ago, I received an email from an international agency asking for PR support with their client. The agency has a strong roster of international clients and corporations. On the surface, I thought this group understood the complexities of PR and the nuance of messaging.
And then I got an email from the account supervisor. She said the client wanted to hear more specifics on the actual deliverables. “For example: How many articles/features would be included? What type of TV placements? Podcast interviews? Estimated timelines? Any guaranteed deliverables?”
But here’s the kicker: she didn’t share any details about the client, their goals from PR, their timeframe, their targeted audience, etc. She treated the campaign like it was another generic PR campaign.
They were asking for a media outcome before defining the actual media challenge. And honestly, that exchange perfectly explains why so many generic PR approaches fail.
Maybe this account executive was young but she should have told the client there is no such thing as guaranteed media coverage. You can’t buy a story on CNBC or the Wall Street Journal. Yes, you can buy an ad, but that’s not the same thing as earned coverage.
(You can read more about the differences of PR and advertising by clicking here).
Continue reading “Why Generic PR Advice Usually Fails”



















